The Library Bulletin

SEARCH ALL POSTS

You might need Lexis Red over the holiday break

Fri Dec 08 2017
  • The library is closing for 4 weeks over the holiday period (see post below) and you might need to access Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure or Cross on Evidence. You know you can through Lexis Red, don't you? Lexis Red is an online looseleaf service that you can access from anywhere. To sign up before the break, email lexisred@nwsbar.asn.au with your full name, email address you would like to sign up with, & phone number and we will get you sorted.

News

Fri Dec 08 2017

MAJOR REFORM TO COPYRIGHT SAFE HARBOUR LEGISLATION

Fri Dec 08 2017
  • The Turnbull Government has this week introduced the Copyright Amendment (Service Providers) Bill 2017 to extend the safe harbour provisions in the Copyright Act to the disability, education, library, archive and cultural sectors. This represents the first step taken to significantly reform safe harbour legislation after more than 10 years of debate and multiple reviews. The measures in the Bill will ensure these sectors are protected from legal liability where they can demonstrate that they have taken reasonable steps to deal with copyright infringement by users of their online platforms. Extending the safe harbour scheme in this way will provide greater certainty to institutions in these sectors and enhance their ability to provide more innovative and creative services for all Australians. The changes will also give copyright owners tools to work with these sectors to prevent copyright infringement by their users.

For more click here

Latest Law Reports

Fri Dec 08 2017
  • Motor Vehicle Reports Vol 82(2) Cases reported in this part:
  • Brewerton v Western Australia (WASCA — Full Court) (2017) 82.176
  • Guss v Traffic Camera Office (VSC — Keogh J) (2017) 82.246
  • Logar v Ambulance Service of New South Wales Sydney Region (NSWCA — Full Court) (2017) 82.216
  • McGuinness v Heffernan (WASCA — Full Court) (2017) 82.204
  • Police v Deng (SASC — Kelly J) (2017) 82.194
  • R v Graham (ACTSC — Mossop J) (2017) 82.132
  • Andalong v O’Neill (NTSC — Full Court) (2017) 82.161

Noteworthy

Fri Dec 08 2017
  • Google updates feature to its search engine To provide people with a larger and more varied spectrum of results in their searches, Google launched a series of new features that attempt to not only answer your questions, but also give you information you didn’t even think to ask about. “In the last few weeks, we’ve made three new additions to help you explore further, including expanded Featured Snippets, improved functionality of Knowledge Panels, and suggested content as you search for a particular topic,” writes Product Manager Michael Galvez on Google’s official blog.

Latest Journals

Fri Dec 08 2017
  • The Australian Law Journal 91/10 In this issue: Conscience, fair-dealing and commerce: Parliaments and the courts Chief Justice James Allsop AO / The decline and fall of Australia's law reform institutions - and the prospects of revival Hon Michael Kirby AC CMGy

  • Law Society Journal Dec 2017 In this issue: The high cost of a failing system: why Australian family law is in tatters and what must be done to fix it / More than statistics: online legal services commitment to maintaining humanity in refugee cases / Driving innovation in law: meet Uber's Asia Pacific head / Is your client legally insane? A guide to testing the experts A constitutional catastrophe: The section 44 debacle explained / A new era in competition law: Outcomes of the Harper Review

Recent Judgments from Australian Courts

Fri Dec 08 2017
  • Thorne v Kennedy [2017] HCA 49 (08 November 2017) (Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ) In Thorne v Kennedy, the High Court unanimously struck down both a prenuptial and a postnuptial agreement (the plurality on the basis of undue influence and unconscionable conduct, and Nettle J and Gordon J on the basis of unconscionable conduct alone). Read more.

  • Esso Australia Pty Ltd v The Australian Workers' Union The Australian Workers' Union v Esso Australia Pty Ltd [2017] HCA 54 (06 December 2017) (Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Nettle and Edelman JJ) The High Court has allowed an appeal and dismissed a second appeal against a decision of the Full Federal Court on protected industrial action and enterprise agreements. During negotiations over a new enterprise bargaining agreement between Esso and the AWU for employees of offshore gas platforms, onshore processing plants, and a marine terminal, AWU organised various forms of industrial action in support of its claims. AWU claimed that each form of industrial action was protected under s 408(a) of the Fair Work Act (Cth), and Esso claimed some forms of purportedly protected action — relating to bans on equipment performance testing, air freeing and leak testing (which the AWU claimed was ‘de-isolation of equipment’) — were not protected. Read More.

End of year holiday closure

Fri Dec 08 2017
  • The library will be closed from 12pm on Friday the 22nd of December to Friday the 19th of January. The Library will also be closed on Friday the 26th of January 2018.
  • If you wish to borrow titles over the closing period please make sure you do before midday on the 22nd of December.
  • The library reopens from 9am to 5pm between Monday 22 January and Thursday 25th January 2018. Normal opening hours resume from Monday 29th January 2018.

Courting Communication Anachronisms: Trkulja v Google [2017] HCATrans 129

Fri Dec 01 2017
  • Consider how many electronic Internet links you click each day on your mobile or laptop. You presumably clicked on a hyperlink to arrive at this very article. The Internet and linked content are reciprocally essential; the benefits of one cannot be realised without the other. Their invention and use has advanced how we communicate, share content, and find information. Prohibiting the use of linking content would be antithetical to the Internet. Unfortunately, Trkulja v Google [2017] HCATrans 129 could have this effect.

Latest Law Reports

Fri Dec 01 2017
  • Intellectual Property Reports Vol 124 Part 3 - Cases reported in this part:
  • Apple and Pear Australia Ltd (ACN 101 551 348) v Pink Lady America LLC (VSCA — Full Court) (2016) 124.497
  • AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc (SCC — Full Court) (2017) 124.614
  • Commonwealth v Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) (FCA — Nicholas J) (2017) 124.427
  • Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc (SCC — Full Court) (2017) 124.595
  • Minas v Brooklite Pty Ltd (IP Aust — R Subbarayan) (2016) 124.566
  • Mizzi Family Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 132 033 615) v Morellini (No 3) (FCA — Dowsett J)
  • Shape Shopfitters Pty Ltd v Shape Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) (FCA — Mortimer J)(2017)124.435

Recent Judgments from Australian Courts

Fri Dec 01 2017
  • Moroccanoil Israel Ltd v Aldi Foods Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 1393 (KATZMANN J - 29 NOVEMBER 2017) Intellectual Property - Costs - where applicant only successful in part of its claim - whether applicant should pay the respondents' costs - application for indemnity costs pursuant to r 25.14 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
  • Commissioner of Taxation v Miley [2017] FCA 1396 (WIGNEY J - 28 NOVEMBER 2017) Taxation - appeal from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) - where Commissioner assessed Respondent as not being entitled to small business cgt concessions under subdivision 152-C of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1977 (Cth)- Practice and Procedure - notice of objection to competency of appeal - whether appeal raises a question of law within the meaning of s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth)

Latest Journals

Fri Dec 01 2017
  • Bond Law Review Vol 29(1) Special Issue on Mediation: Mediation ethics and the challenge of professionalisation Jonathon Crowe / Including trans and gender diverse, intersex and or non-heterosexual people in mediation service delivery Olivia Rundle / An imperfect protection: attitudes of family dispute resolution practitioners to confidentiality Joe Harman / The potential of procedural justice in mediation: A study into mediators understandings Kathy Douglas and Jennifer Hurley / The structural causes of workplace conflict: understanding the implications for the mediation of workplace disputes Meriel O'Sullivan / To co-mediate or not to co-mediate: that is the question Keryn Foley